Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts

Monday, August 29, 2016

Cause white dudes need all the love…



I read the Houston Chronicle every Sunday while I eat breakfast. I’m sad that it’s gotten so small, and some weeks, it feels more like a flyer than a full paper what with all the ads in it.

This week, I had even more reason to be disappointed. Despite all the important news going on in the world, there were two feature pieces that told me they are completely at of touch:
“White men get help in addressing diversity”
“Working-class whites are having a moment”

Yup. Two big ass articles about white men. (To be fair, the second piece isn’t *just* about men, and it was written by a woman, but still...)

In the first piece, a middle-aged white guy, Bill Proudman – not a joke name – is interviewed about his business, “White Men as Full Diversity Partners.” I think my favorite line in the whole article is when the author summarizes a point from Proudman, saying that minorities often quite their jobs because “they feel mistreated because of their ethnicity or gender.”

Those bastards! How dare they feel like they’re being discriminated against! It’s not like they are, wait, never mind. They are. Duh.

But there’s more!

According to the piece, “the workers who quit, though, also hurt themselves and their communities when they miss out on promotions and pay raises.” 

The problem they don’t seem to see is that they quit because of a *lack* of promotions and pay raises. They are trying to better themselves, but the discrimination stops it from happening. And then white guys say things like that, causing the “others” to suddenly be at fault for their responses.

I understand that Proudman is trying to help, but maybe if he had a diverse staff, that might show that he’s not just profiting from talking the talk.

The second piece has an awesome first paragraph:
“White trash, trailer trash, rednecks, hillbillies, squatters, crackers, goobers, and bubbas – all the names for these people are insulting. Their avatars in the culture, from Honey Boo-Boo to Bob and Mayella Ewll in ‘To Kill a Mockingbird,’ are the opposite of inspiring.”

Woah. Really? Are you telling me that white people are…gasp!...sometimes painted in a negative light?!

In a later part of the article, there’s a comment from UT Professor John Hartigan, Jr.
‘That the white trash are simultaneously treated almost as badly as black people and still seen as the source of racial prejudice is just one of the paradoxes fueling white-trash hatred.’

Now, he’s talking about a book here, but still.

Think about this.

Poor white people being treated ALMOST AS BADLY as black people causes racial prejudice.

Let me get this right: unless the poor whites are treated better than black people, they’re going to be mad about it?

Because, somehow, they deserve to be treated better than black people?

Shouldn’t this be more about the fact that, while poor white people are treated badly, they still aren’t being treated as badly as an entire race?

My head hurt just reading this.

Now, I get it – don’t shoot the messenger. Just because he brought up the feeling behind it doesn’t mean he supports it or agrees with it. (No hate mail to him, please.)

But the fact that it IS the truth is more the problem.

How do you convince people that they don’t have to look down on anyone else? That they can just focus on themselves? That no one is deserving of scorn?

I have no idea. But I think we need to figure it out if we’re going to fix it.

Friday, January 2, 2015

Discrimination is okay when you have money, right?

All About the Benjamins...image by hyena reality via freedigitalphotos.net



Another brouhaha made it into the news when, once again, a sect of ultra-Orthodox Jewish men refused to sit next to women on a flight.  This was not the first time it happened, and I’m sure it won’t be the last. 

The basic story is this: the men didn’t want to take their assigned seats because – gasp – they would be forced to sit next  to women, and their religion tells them that ‘physical contact between men and women is forbidden unless they are first-degree relatives or married to one another.’

I was discussing the issue with a guy, and his response was, “But they offered to pay to swap seats with the women.” 

I tried to point out that it didn’t matter if they offered money – discrimination was discrimination, and while it is nice that they had the money to pay for it, that didn’t make it any less wrong.

He didn’t get it at first, and I pointed out that might because it wasn’t his “group” being treated that way.  So I came up with some other examples…

What if someone decided that they couldn’t sit next to you because you were black?
Because you were disabled?
Because you were American?
Because you were Christian?
Because you were Muslim?

How many of those things would be wrong, even if they offered you money to make it better?

Dividing a plane based on gender seems to be the equivalent of dividing a bus based on color. 

The guy I was talking to got my point after I drew the parallels, but I wish I didn’t have to.  I wish that people would make the parallels on their own, would be able to feel empathy with those who are being discriminated against. 

So just a quick reminder – discrimination is wrong.  It doesn’t matter if you try to couch it in religion or money. 

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Lenovo – You’re the Dick!



So I got two emails from a company I used to love...Lenovo.  I say “used to love them” because right about now, not so much.  

But wait – what am I fuming about?

I got two – not just one, mind you, but two! – ads in email from Lenovo over the holiday weekend. 

Their tag line for their labor day sale?  “To the man working for the man.”

Yeah, “to the man” and the subject line of the first email was, as you can see in the pic, “You’re the man.” 

No.  No.  No, no, no, no, no.  I need to return my computer now.

Yes, this is a screen capture of the ad I received...
gotta love a company who knows that only men use computers!

Here goes my return letter:

Dear Lenovo,



Apparently, you got confused about who owned one of your computers.  Because, you see, I’m not “the man.”  And, in fact, while I work for some men, I also work for some women.  So I’m not even working for “the man.” (Yes, I get the reference to “the man,” but that’s just as insulting – assuming that only men are in charge…)



So, Lenovo, while I’ve had my computer for several months now, and I even posted about how awesome the customer service was, I now see the folly of my ways.  I apparently purchased a product meant only for men.  I would like to return my computer and get a refund.  Of course, I’m not sure if that’s possible.  To be fair, I have been using my computer, and I may have gotten women-cooties all over it. 



Perhaps in the future, you will deem it proper to make a product that women like me can enjoy.  Until then, I will just have to save up and buy a Dell.



Sincerely,

A Totally Pissed-Off Crazy Ass Feminist

(And, yes, I actually did send the letter with my contact information to Lenovo through their Customer Service website…)